25%
Weight differences between technical solutions
A leading luxury sports car manufacturer sought to strengthen its position in the electric vehicle market through comprehensive battery technology analysis. EFESO worked with the team to evaluate four competitor BEV vehicles’ battery sub-systems, examining cooling, cell stacking, busbar design and thermal propagation solutions.
Industry: Automotive and Commercial Vehicles
Service: Cost and Value Engineering
Service: Manufacturing
Service: Product Profitability
Service: R&d and Product Development
Service: R&d and Product Profitability
This luxury sports car manufacturer operates at the pinnacle of automotive performance and craftsmanship. The company produces exclusive high-performance vehicles. The organization was developing its new battery electric vehicle platform and needed strategic guidance on technical solutions for high-voltage battery components, to maintain its competitive edge in the evolving electric vehicle landscape.
Entering the high-performance electric vehicle market required critical design decisions for which comprehensive market intelligence was necessary. The manufacturer faced several obstacles:
The comprehensive benchmarking analysis provided clear guidance for battery system design decisions. Working with the client's engineering teams, we delivered insights on cost-weight-performance trade-offs across four critical battery sub-systems. Such as a twenty-two percentage of cost differences when normalized for battery capacity.
25%
Weight differences between technical solutions
€16 - €21
Per Kwh cost range identified
1.5Kg
Per Kwh lightest solution
The engagement began by collaborating with the manufacturer to select and agree on four benchmark BEVs (battery electric vehicles), each representing a different approach to battery design in top-tier electric vehicles. We carefully defined the boundaries of the four component scopes with the client, ensuring clear categorization of what counted under busbar, cooling system, cell stacking and thermal propagation chapters.
Our analysis leveraged publicly available industry benchmarks and expert interpretation, using specialized platforms for bill of materials analysis. The team evaluated key parameters including energy density, total storage capacity, cooling system efficacy, material composition and modular design elements. We developed cost and weight estimates for each sub-system across all four vehicles, normalizing values per kilowatt/hour to enable meaningful comparisons despite different battery capacities.
The methodology included detailed technical descriptions of the differences between solutions, with visual representations highlighting the specific components under analysis. This approach enabled the client’s engineering and procurement teams to understand not just what solutions existed, but how costs and weights adjusted according to specific design choices.