7
Production and R&D facilities
A North American soil health innovator faced escalating raw material costs that threatened its competitive position. Working with EFESO, the company evaluated nine network configurations to identify optimal production and sourcing strategies. The transformation delivered $3.87M in annual savings while positioning the business for international expansion.
Industry: Chemicals
Service: Operations Strategy and Transformation
Service: Procurement
Service: Supply Chain
This North American innovator specializes in proprietary humic and fulvic acid-based inputs that enhance nutrient uptake, water retention and crop yield for growers worldwide.
The company operates seven production and R&D facilities across North America, with a global reach. Following a recent change in ownership, the management team sought to redesign its supply chain and production network to prepare for international expansion and maintain its position as a leader in soil health solutions.
7
Production and R&D facilities
$22.59M
Current annual network cost
The company needed to tackle a fundamental shift in raw materials economics that threatened to undermine its entire cost structure. The immediate catalyst was anticipated price increases from its Canadian raw material supplier, with costs projected to rise from $139/MT to $240/MT.
This prompted management to evaluate strategic alternatives including:
The network footprint evaluation delivered clear, data-backed insights that enabled informed strategic decision-making.
Together, we identified an optimal configuration that transformed cost pressures into competitive advantage while building in the flexibility required for future growth.
$3.87M
Annual cost reduction vs. baseline
$1.77M
Annual savings vs. current state
$66/MT
Alternative raw material cost achieved
EFESO applied a structured, data-driven methodology to evaluate the client’s network footprint. The approach began with comprehensive baseline modeling grounded in financial and operational data, including raw material costs from multiple sources, conversion ratios, freight and logistics costs, labor and utility expenses, capital expenditure requirements and plant-level capacity and utilization.
The team developed nine distinct network scenarios testing combinations of raw material sourcing strategies, including facility consolidation options, new plant construction near lower-cost raw material sources and upgrades to existing facilities. Each scenario underwent rigorous cost and investment analysis to evaluate total annual operating costs, capital investment required, payback period and strategic flexibility.
Through optimization and trade-off evaluation, the team identified Scenario 7 as the most cost-effective and strategically aligned option. This involved building a new facility near a low-cost raw material source, upgrading Plant 2 to handle small pack and export operations and consolidating production from Plant 1 into Plant 3.