153
Employees at the key facility
A wine producer faced the challenge of maintaining premium quality while managing rising costs across its operations. Together with EFESO, it implemented a comprehensive total productive maintenance program across bottling, cellar and support functions. This transformation engaged 76 employees in continuous improvement initiatives, creating sustainable operational excellence.
Industry: Food & Beverage
Service: Manufacturing
Service: Operations Strategy and Transformation
Service: People and Organization
The Italian company produces approximately 29 million bottles of wine annually across 37 labels, supplying 83 countries. It operates through 570 hectares of vineyards across estates in Italy, focusing on historic appellations including Chianti, Chianti Classico, Brunello di Montalcino, Prosecco and Pinot Grigio. Its key facility encompasses three production lines with varying capacities and complexity levels.
153
Employees at the key facility
83
Countries supplied
29M
Bottles produced annually
570
Hectares of vineyards
The company’s operations faced multiple pressures requiring systematic transformation to maintain the company’s position as a premium wine producer:
The total productive maintenance implementation transformed the company's operations across all production areas, including a sixty-five percent decrease in complaints. Working alongside the company’s teams, we established systematic approaches to maintenance, quality control and continuous improvement that delivered measurable operational excellence.
-81%
Reduction in breakdowns
€41K
Annual cost savings
-77%
Reduction in sludge disposals
The transformation began with establishing eight TPM pillars: focused improvement, autonomous maintenance, professional maintenance, quality maintenance, early equipment management, training & education, lean office and safety, health & environment. Each pillar team included cross-functional members from production, maintenance, quality, and support functions.
We implemented structured daily performance control system meetings, weekly production-service meetings, and quarterly steering committee reviews. The approach emphasized knowledge transfer through one point lessons and standard operating procedures, with operators trained in autonomous maintenance activities.
Teams applied systematic problem-solving tools including 5 whys analysis, Ishikawa diagrams and Kaizen methodologies. The manufacturing execution system implementation enabled automatic data collection for micro-stops and breakdowns, providing real-time visibility for continuous improvement.